Sometimes, a business meeting, or a particular section of it, may be conducted under the Chatham House Rule. It implies that the members of the meeting can use the information shared (to some extent). However, no one is allowed to identify the speakers or participants. The rule serves as a foundation for nurturing a trusted environment to discuss complex issues.
The Chatham House Rule reads, ‘When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed.’
The Chatham House Rule was created by the UK Royal Institute of International Affairs. It is an independent organisation that kindles debate on international issues. The institute was established in 1920, and it received the Chatham House, an 18th-century, grade-I house in St. James's Square, as a gift in 1923. In June 1927, the Chatham House Rule was created, named after the headquarters of the institute. The rule was later modified in 1992 and 2002.
The Chatham House Rule has been used to hold meetings based on the principles of trust and discretion. Here are its key features:
Under the Chatham House Rule, members are free to publicise the discussions. However, no one can reveal the identity/affiliation of the speakers or other participants.
The rule has encouraged freedom of speech in meetings since its inception. The members can speak on sensitive topics without any fear of being viewed in a negative light.
In today’s divided atmosphere, the rule encourages candour in meetings. It is essential for breaking down barriers and producing fresh new ideas.
Even if participants stay true to the anonymity rule, some topics can be clearly attributed to certain individuals. That is why parts of a meeting under this rule are often ‘off minutes’.
Despite the redeeming qualities of the Chatham House Rule, many people have pointed out some potential issues:
Due to technical advances, it has become unrealistic to keep anything confidential. Even under the rule, the trend of ‘leaking’ information and posting it online makes confidentiality a mere illusion.
Some aspects of the rule make it ambiguous, especially regarding sharing information. Meeting members often misuse it to keep useful information from being publicised.
Invoking the Chatham House Rule creates a sense of importance. More often than not, it is used to set an illusion of worth instead of creating a safe space for sensitive topics.
Want to know more?
Do you have any additional questions about "Chatham House Rules"?
Speak to one of our consultants, we are here to help.